Topic: Sun 未公开的 API 文档

  Print this page
1.Sun 未公开的 API 文档 Copy to clipboard
Posted by: Lawme
Posted on: 2004-11-14 07:51

sun.net 是 JDK 的底层类库，官方文档中没有它的 API。

从网上发现了一个，下载压缩后贴出，对直接进行底层调用编程或许有用。

sun-net-doc.rar (234.63k)
2.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: YuLimin
Posted on: 2004-11-14 10:21

晕，还有这东东都被你给搜到了，呵呵：）
3.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: kjjx
Posted on: 2004-11-14 20:06

下了，好东东，thx
4.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: 鸡肋男
Posted on: 2004-11-15 10:23

这应该是sun的JDK的实现，如果换了ibm实现的jdk恐怕就不一样了。这是非标准的一部分。
5.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: PrimeJava
Posted on: 2004-11-15 15:22

打包成CHM格式了

sun-net-doc.chm (145.11k)
6.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: tonik
Posted on: 2004-11-16 00:12

辛苦了 谢谢 一定努力研究
7.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: kobeL
Posted on: 2004-11-20 14:18

辛苦了.老兄.谢谢了.大家一起努力研究!
8.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: zcjl
Posted on: 2004-11-20 14:28

辛苦！谢谢！
9.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: frankwater
Posted on: 2004-11-24 23:02

辛苦！
10.Programs that contain direct calls to the sun.* packages are not 100% Pure Java [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: jsmile
Posted on: 2004-11-25 05:10



Click here to open a new window
11.100% 的纯 Java 绝对重要吗? [Re: jsmile] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: Lawme
Posted on: 2004-11-25 08:55

100% 的纯 Java 绝对重要吗?

Sun 倡导纯粹的 Java 有其利益需要，通常对用户是有利的；
IBM 倡导非纯粹的 Java 如 SWT，也有其利益需要，通常对用户也是有利的。

因此，纯粹的 Java 和非纯粹的 Java ，各有优点和缺点，适用于不同的应用需求。
应当从用户需要的实际出发，不必把某些教条看得太重。
12.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: jsmile
Posted on: 2004-11-25 09:50

My last post is just a FYI.
Sun just does not recommend developers to use sun.* package. As Sun says in the document:
1. It is not supported. Your application works on this version of JVM, but may not work on another version of JVM. So when you upgrade your JVM, even a maintenance release, your application may break. And most likely it won't work in BEA, IBM or other vendor's JVM.
2. It's platform-dependent. So if you develop your application on Windows, it may not be able to be deployed to Linux, Unix, etc..., even use the same version of Sun JVM.
It all depends, if you just want to play around and if you are willing to take those risks, sure you can use it. But if you are doing some serious projects, I think you should stay away from it.
I think pure Java is very important in terms of the portability and compatibility.
13.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: chobits81
Posted on: 2004-12-05 11:52

好的。。。。谢谢了
14.Re:Sun 未公开的 API 文档 [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: tcxmn
Posted on: 2004-12-08 16:36

感谢各位！
15.Re:100% 的纯 Java 绝对重要吗? [Re: Lawme] Copy to clipboard
Posted by: genphen
Posted on: 2004-12-10 10:30

Lawme wrote:
100% 的纯 Java 绝对重要吗?

Sun 倡导纯粹的 Java 有其利益需要，通常对用户是有利的；
IBM 倡导非纯粹的 Java 如 SWT，也有其利益需要，通常对用户也是有利的。

因此，纯粹的 Java 和非纯粹的 Java ，各有优点和缺点，适用于不同的应用需求。
应当从用户需要的实际出发，不必把某些教条看得太重。


我想您大概理解错了100% Pure Java，并不是说代码一定要纯Java，而只是要纯“移植”性。我想移植性还是很重要的，如果C++程序好移植的话，我就不用学Java了。

   Powered by Jute Powerful Forum® Version Jute 1.5.6 Ent
Copyright © 2002-2021 Cjsdn Team. All Righits Reserved. 闽ICP备05005120号-1
客服电话 18559299278    客服信箱 714923@qq.com    客服QQ 714923